Readers as overhearers and texts as objects: joint attention in reading communities
Models of language that emphasize the interactive dimension of meaning construction tend to talk about published texts such as the novel as an arena of language use in which writers and readers occupy the positions of speaker and addressee. This paper argues that readers of published texts function in many ways more like overhearers than addressees. It uses tools from Conversation Analysis and Mental Spaces Theory to examine several case study interactions, drawn from the Michigan Corpus of Spoken Academic English and videotaped data from gesture research, as well as illustrative examples from literary history. The overhearer model that emerges suggests that the interactions between different readers of the same text are a more important locus of collaboration in literary discourse than is typically assumed, and shows that joint activities between readers also often exclude authors in interesting and important ways.
ARANDA, Natalie. The Pros and Cons of Vinyl Fencing. EzineArticles. Disponível em: <http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Pros-and-Cons-of-VinylFencing&id=434398>. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2007.
ARIEL, Mira. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge, 1990.
BARTHES, Roland. The Death of the Author. In: BARTHES, Roland. Image, music, text. Tradução de Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. p. 142-47.
BATTIATA, Mary. Blood Feud. Washington Post. 22 May 2005. W8.
BOOTH, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
BRUCE, Bertram C. A Social Interaction Model of Reading. Discourse processes, v. 4, p. 273-311, 1981.
CHAFE, Wallace L. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
CLARK, Herbert H. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
CLARK, Herbert H.; BRENNAN, Susan A. Grounding in Communication. In: RESNICK, Lauren B.; LEVINE, John M.; TEASLEY, Stephanie D. (Ed.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: APA Books, 1991. p. 127-49.
DIXON, Peter; BORTOLUSSI, Marisa. Text Is Not Communication: A Challenge to a Common Assumption. Discourse processes, v. 31, p. 1-25, 2001.
FAUCONNIER, Gilles; TURNER, Mark. The way we think. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
FILLMORE, Charles J. Frame Semantics. In: THE LINGUISTIC SOCIETY OF KOREA (Ed.). Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 1982. p. 111-37.
FROST, Robert. Mending Wall. In: FROST, Robert. North of Boston. New York: Dover Reprint, 28, 1915.
GERRIG, Richard J. Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1993.
GIBBS, Raymond W. The poetics of mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
GIBBS, Raymond W. Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
GOFFMAN, Erving. Footing. In: GOFFMAN, Erving. Forms of talk.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981. p. 124-59.
GOODWIN, Charles. The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Editrado por George Psathas. New York: Irvington Publishers, 1979. p. 97-121.
GOODWIN, Charles. Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning. Sociological inquiry, v. 50, p. 272-302, 1980.
GOODWIN, Charles. Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation. Text, v. 6, p. 283-316, 1986.
GRAESSER, Arthur C.; BOWERS, Cheryl; OLDE, Brent; POMEROY, Victoria. Who said What? Source Memory for Narrator and Character Agents in Literary Short Stories. Journal of educational psychology, v. 91, p. 284-300, 1999.
JEFFERSON, Gail. Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. In: SCHENKEIN, Jim. Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, 1978. p. 219-48.
LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Leaky Cauldron. 2000. Transcript: Joanne K. Rowling at Radio City in “An Evening with Harry, Carrie and Garp”. Disponível em: <http://www.the-leakycauldron.org/page/event-reports/jkrnycnight1>. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2007.
LELLENBERG, Jon; STASHOWER, Daniel; FOLEY, Charles. Arthur Conan Doyle: A Life in Letters. New York: Penguin Press, 2007.
NARAYAN, Shweta. Maybe what it means is that he actually got the spot: Physical and cognitive viewpoint in a gesture study. In: DANCYGIER, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve (Ed.). Viewpoint in language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
NOLEN, Susan Bobbitt. Effects of Visible Author on Statistics Texts. Journal of educational psychology, v. 87, p. 47-65, 1995.
PASCUAL, Esther. Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual Blending and Fictive Interaction in Criminal Courts. Utrecht: LOT, 2002. Dissertation Series, n. 68.
ROBERTSON, S. Good hedges make good neighbors. The gazette. 9 Aug. 2003.
SCHOBER, Michael F.; CLARK, Herbert H. 1989. Understanding by Addressees and Overhearers. Cognitive psychology, v. 21, p. 211-232, 1989.
SIMPSON, Rita C.; BRIGGS, Sarah L.; OVENS, Janine; SWALES, John M. The michigan corpus of academic spoken english. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan, 2002.
Unfogged.com. Is Economics Science, Or Are Economists More Like 19th Century Natural Philosophers? Messages posted to <http://www.unfogged.com/archives/comments_5794.html>. Acesso em 16 nov. 2006.
TALMY, Leonard. Fictive Motion in Language and “Ception”. In: BLOOM, Paul; PETERSON, Mary A.; NADEL, Lynn; GARRETT, Merrill F. (Ed.). Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996. p. 211-276.
TOBIN, Vera. Ways of Reading Sherlock Holmes: The Entrenchment of Discourse Blends. Language and literature, v. 15, p. 73-90, 2006.
TURNER, Mark. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
WIMSATT, William Kurtz; BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. Intention. In: Dictionary of world literature. Editado por Joseph T. Shipley. New York: Philosophical Library, 1942. p. 326-9.
WIMSATT, William Kurtz; BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. The Intentional Fallacy. The verbal icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1954. p. 3-18.
O envio de qualquer colaboração implica, automaticamente, a cessão integral dos direitos autorais à PUC Minas. Solicita-se aos autores assegurarem:
- a inexistência de conflito de interesses (relações entre autores, empresas/instituições ou indivíduos com interesse no tema abordado pelo artigo), e
- órgãos ou instituições financiadoras da pesquisa que deu origem ao artigo.
- todos os trabalhos submetidos estarão automaticamente inscritos sob uma licença creative commons do tipo "by-nc-nd/4.0".